Real Interests and Incoherent Desires

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 36 (1):51-68 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The fact of pluralism has set a number of practical and theoretical problems for political theorists. One of the most serious difficulties is the question of the criteria for judgment. What critical standards are available when encountering a society's practices that are different from one's own? One strategy for dealing with this is to separate out questions of ethics from questions of morality. We argue that this is a particularly unfruitful conceptual strategy. Rather our position is that the concept of real interests is already operant within the practices of judgment that constitute a community, or a form of life. Our strategy is to first explore the possibility of immanent normative critique of interests expressed in forms of life using Wittgenstein and Dewey in light of Rahel Jaeggi's Critique of Forms of Life. Properly understanding how these standards of immanent critique work dissolves the problem of how to apply these to external contexts. While Jaeggi's is an excellent contribution to the discourse on critique and justification, we find that there are commitments in her idea of “immanent critique” that require reformulation with respect to the question of real interests.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empathy, Shared Intentionality, and Motivation by Moral Reasons.Marion Hourdequin - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (3):403 - 419.
Well-Being, Time, and Dementia.Jennifer Hawkins - 2014 - Ethics 124 (3):507-542.
Ambiguous Interests: Maternal Desires and Fetal Interests.Peter Maloy Koch - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (2):31-33.
Desires and reasons.Alan Goldman - 2009 - American Philosophical Quarterly 46 (4):291 - 304.
Two Arguments against Biological Interests.Aaron Simmons - 2010 - Environmental Ethics 32 (3):229-245.
Prudence and the reasons of rational persons.Duncan MacIntosh - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):346 – 365.
On desires and practical reasons.John J. Tilley - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (32):5-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
11 (#1,144,064)

6 months
5 (#648,618)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Brendan Hogan
New York University
Lawrence Marcelle
New York University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references