Kinship terminology: polysemy or categorization?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):386-387 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The target article offers an analysis of the categorization of kin types and empirical evidence that cross-cultural universals may be amenable to OT explanation. Since the analysis concerns the structuring of conceptual categories rather than the use of words, it differs from previous OT analyses in lexical semantics in what is considered to be the input and output of optimization.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The algebraic logic of kinship terminology structures.Dwight W. Read - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):399-401.
Pragmatic and positivistic analyses of kinship terminology.Murray J. Leaf - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):390-391.
Polysemy: theoretical and computational approaches.Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lexical semantics: the problem of polysemy.J. Pustejovsky & Bran Boguraev (eds.) - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Kinship terms are not kinship.Maurice Bloch - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):384-384.
Studies in Legal Terminology.Ervin Paul Hexner - 1941 - Chapel Hill: F.B. Rothman.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
37 (#409,683)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references