The overdiagnosis of what? On the relationship between the concepts of overdiagnosis, disease, and diagnosis

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4):453-464 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Overdiagnosis and disease are related concepts. Widened conceptions of disease increase overdiagnosis and vice versa. This is partly because there is a close and complex relationship between disease and overdiagnosis. In order to address the problems with overdiagnosis, we may benefit from a closer understanding this relationship. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to elucidate the relationship between disease and overdiagnosis. To do so, the article starts with scrutinizing how overdiagnosis can explain the expansion of the concept of disease. Then it investigates how definitions of disease address various challenges of overdiagnosis. The article specifically investigates recent attempts to clarify the relationship between the concepts of disease and overdiagnosis. Several shortcomings are identified and lead to a closer analysis of overdiagnosis in the diagnostic process. Contrary to recent contributions to the field, it is argued that cases of overdiagnosis are not cases of disease. They are non-verified labelling of disease. It is revealed how overdiagnosis establishes an unwarranted link between indicative phenomena, such as polyps or cell changes, and harm, and thereby generates a link to disease. One implication of this study is that we should stop attributing disease language to indicative phenomena. That is, we should stop calling it “cancer screening” when we are actually searching for polyps. Another implications is that we should strive for scientific progress in differentiating phenomena that are of negative value to us from those that are not. In overdiagnosis we diagnose something that is not disease: it is over-diagnosis.

Other Versions

reprint Hofmann, Bjørn (2017) "The Overdiagnosis of What? On the Relationship between the Concepts of Overdiagnosis, Disease, and Diagnosis". Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal 20(4):453-464

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 97,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defining disease in the context of overdiagnosis.Mary Jean Walker & Wendy Rogers - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):269-280.
Getting clearer on overdiagnosis.Wendy A. Rogers & Yishai Mintzker - 2016 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22 (4):580-587.
Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.Bjørn Hofmann - 2016 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (2):253-264.
Death Sentences.Stephen John - 2022 - Philosophy of Medicine 3 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-26

Downloads
54 (#316,189)

6 months
12 (#445,147)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Medical epistemology.Henk ten Have & Bert Gordijn - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4):451-452.
The Collateral Finding of What?Bjørn Hofmann - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (1):26-28.
Evidens, estetikk og etikk.Bjørn Hofmann - 2022 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1:33-52.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Health as a theoretical concept.Christopher Boorse - 1977 - Philosophy of Science 44 (4):542-573.
What a theory of mental health should be.Christopher Boorse - 1976 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 6 (1):61–84.
Defining 'health' and 'disease'.Marc Ereshefsky - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 40 (3):221-227.

View all 30 references / Add more references