BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):18 (2013)

Abstract
BackgroundBariatric surgery for children and adolescents is becoming widespread. However, the evidence is still scarce and of poor quality, and many of the patients are too young to consent. This poses a series of moral challenges, which have to be addressed both when considering bariatric surgery introduced as a health care service and when deciding for treatment for young individuals. A question based (Socratic) approach is applied to reveal underlying moral issues that can be relevant to an open and transparent decision making process.DiscussionA wide range of moral issues with bariatric surgery for children and adolescents is identified in the literature. There is a moral imperative to help obese minors avoiding serious health problems, but there is little high quality evidence on safety, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness for bariatric surgery in this group. Lack of maturity and family relations poses a series of challenges with autonomy, informed consent, assent, and assessing the best interest of children and adolescents. Social aspects of obesity, such as medicalization, prejudice, and discrimination, raise problems with justice and trust in health professionals. Conceptual issues, such as definition of obesity and treatment end-points, present moral problems. Hidden interests of patients, parents, professionals, industry, and society need to be revealed.SummaryPerforming bariatric surgery for obese children and adolescents in order to discipline their behavior warrants reflection and caution. More evidence on outcomes is needed to be able to balance benefits and risks, to provide information for a valid consent or assent, and to advise minors and parents
Keywords Bariatric surgery  Children  Adolescents  Ethics  Moral
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-14-18
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Debating Ethical Expertise.Norbert L. Steinkamp, Bert Gordijn & Henk A. . M. . J. Ten Have - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (2):173-192.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Encompassing Ethics of Bariatric Surgery.Bjørn Hofmann - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (12):W1-W2.
The Elusive Goal of Informed Consent by Adolescents.Susan E. Zinner - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (4).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-05-01

Total views
133 ( #87,907 of 2,506,511 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,244 of 2,506,511 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes