A Naturalistic Exploration of Forms and Functions of Analogizing

Metaphor and Symbol 24 (3):125-154 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to invigorate debate concerning the nature of analogy, and to broaden the scope of current conceptions of analogy. We argue that analogizing is not a single or even a fundamental cognitive process. The argument relies on an analysis of the history of the concept of analogy, case studies on the use of analogy in scientific problem solving, cognitive research on analogy comprehension and problem solving, and a survey of computational mechanisms of analogy comprehension. Analogizing is regarded as a macrocognitive phenomenon having a number of supporting processes. These include the apperception of resemblances and distinctions, metaphor, and the balancing of semantic flexibility and inference constraint. Psychological theories and computational models have generally relied on (a) a sparse set of ontological concepts (a property called “similarity” and a structuralist categorization of types of semantic relations), (b) a single form category (i.e., the classic four-term analogy), and (c) a single set of morphological distinctions (e.g., verbal vs. pictorial analogies). This article presents a classification based on a “naturalistic” exploration of the variety of uses of analogical reasoning in pragmatically distinct contexts. The resultant taxonomy distinguishes pre-hoc, ad-hoc, post-hoc, pro-hoc, contra-hoc, and trans-hoc analogy. Each will require its own macrocognitive modeling, and each presents an opportunity for research on phenomena of reasoning that have been neglected.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,960

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasoning from Imagery and Analogy in Scientific Concept Formation.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:41 - 47.
Analogy.Наталья Томова - 2020 - Philosophical Anthropology 6 (1):102-119.
Analogy-making in situation theory.Emre Sahin & Varol Akman - 2008 - In Randal B. Bernstein & Wesley N. Curtis (eds.), Artificial Intelligence: New Research. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.. pp. 299-321.
Analogy.Dedre Gentner - 1998 - In George Graham & William Bechtel (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 107–113.
Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments.J. E. Adler - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-27

Downloads
22 (#989,090)

6 months
8 (#636,535)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Thomas Eskridge
Florida Institute of Technology
Robert Hoffman
University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Metaphors We Live By.George Lakoff & Mark Johnson - 1980 - Ethics 93 (3):619-621.
Models and Analogies in Science.Mary B. Hesse - 1966 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 3 (3):190-191.
Explanatory coherence (plus commentary).Paul Thagard - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):435-467.

View all 35 references / Add more references