Defining and Conceptualizing Impact Investing: Attractive Nuisance or Catalyst?

Journal of Business Ethics 179 (4):937-950 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This introduction to the special issue on impact investing applies the attractive nuisance notion to impact investing. Social sector actors ‘trespassing’ on the playing field of conventional investment markets may not appreciate the risks. We apply the framework of essentially contested concepts to foster fruitful diverse research in this emerging research field. We advance six dimensions, which we propose allow to describe different sub-clusters of how the term is used in research and practice. For each dimension we identify risks and opportunities stemming from the contested nature and highlight an ambitious research agenda for how future business ethics scholars can help address and foster impact investing. We conclude by illustrating how the papers in this special issue address these challenges.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why ESG Investing Needs to be Updated for the AI Economy.James Brusseau - 2021 - Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment (TBD):TBD.
Social Investing: Mainstream or Backwater? [REVIEW]Thomas W. Dunfee - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):247 - 252.
Social entrepreneurship and impact investing.Maarten J. Verkerk - 2013 - Philosophia Reformata 78 (2):209-221.
Liability for the bad behaviour of others.Bright Susan - 2001 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 21 (2):311-330.
Coming Out of the Investors’ Cave?Harry Hummels - 2012 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 31 (2):331-348.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-27

Downloads
23 (#661,981)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?