Anthropic reasoning does not conflict with observation

Analysis 65 (1):42–45 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We grant that anthropic reasoning yields the result that we should not expect to be in a small civilization. However, regardless of what civilization one finds oneself in, one can use anthropic reasoning to get the result that one should not expect to be in that sort of civilization. Hence, contra Ken Olum, anthropic reasoning does not conflict with observation.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
549 (#31,277)

6 months
92 (#43,247)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Dien Ho
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
The Nature of Necessity.Alvin Plantinga - 1974 - Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 178 (3):388-390.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.

View all 12 references / Add more references