Three Standards of Athletic Superiority

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (3):289-302 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to deepen our understanding of the inherent purpose of sports competitions. In ‘On Winning and Athletic Superiority’, Nicholas Dixon states that the central comparative purpose of an athletic contest is to determine which team or player is superior, or, synonymously, to provide an accurate measure of athletic superiority. Dixon identifies athletic skill as the standard of athletic superiority in competitive sport. However, I argue there are three separate standards of athletic superiority: the demonstration of athletic skill, the achievement of prelusory goal using lusory means, and achievement of superior formal result. This stance responds to Dixon’s argument that failed athletic contests are contests that have not fulfilled the central purpose of competitive sport, because they have been undermined by refereeing errors, cheating, gamesmanship or bad luck. I argue that a failed athletic contest occurs when any of the three standards of athletic superiority conflict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Betterness, injustice and failed athletic contests.Arvi Pakaslahti - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (2):281-293.
Three Standards of Athletic Superiority.Mika Hämäläinen - 2014 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 41 (3):289-302.
On Winning and Athletic Superiority.Nicholas Dixon - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):10-26.
Athletic Beauty in Classical Greece: A Philosophical View.Heather Reid - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (2):281-297.
Performance-Enhancing Technologies and the Values of Athletic Competition.David Wasserman - 2008 - Philosophy and Public Policy Quarterly 28 (3/4):22-27.
Standards, Double Standards and No Standards.Beuy Joob & Viroj Wiwanitkit - 2015 - Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):265-265.
Trying and Getting Credit.Steven G. Smith - 1988 - Philosophy and Theology 3 (2):133-144.
The Kanizsa square does not engender a configural superiority effect.Birgitta Dresp - 1993 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (3):183-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
18 (#711,533)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On Winning and Athletic Superiority.Nicholas Dixon - 1999 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 26 (1):10-26.
On Winning and Athletic Superiority.Nicholas Dixon - 2007 - In William John Morgan (ed.), Ethics in Sport. Human Kinetics.

View all 8 references / Add more references