Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):250 (2019)

Authors
Ole Thomassen Hjortland
University of Bergen
Abstract
Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the Quinean view that logical theories have no special epistemological status, in particular, they are not self-evident or justified a priori. Instead, logical theories are continuous with scientific theories, and knowledge about logic is as hard-earned as knowledge of physics, economics, and chemistry. Once we reject apriorism about logic, however, we need an alternative account of how logical theories are justified and revised. A number of authors have recently argued that logical theories are justified by abductive argument. This paper explores one crucial question about the abductive strategy: what counts as evidence for a logical theory? I develop three accounts of evidential confirmation that an anti-exceptionalist can accept: intuitions about validity, the Quine-Williamson account, and indispensability arguments. I argue, against the received view, that none of the evidential sources support classical logic.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.26686/ajl.v16i7.5912
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Modal Logic as Metaphysics.Timothy Williamson - 2013 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael Dummett - 1991 - Harvard University Press.

View all 72 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Limits of Abductivism About Logic.Ulf Hlobil - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):320-340.
Logic as a Methodological Discipline.Gil Sagi - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):9725-9749.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (3):631-658.
The Adoption Problem and Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.Suki Finn - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):231.
Logical Constants.J. A. Chadwick - 1927 - Mind 36 (141):1-11.
Logical Constants.K. Warmbrod - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):503 - 538.
Logical Constants.K. WarmbrÕ & D. - 1999 - Mind 108 (431):503-538.
Conceptualizing Classical Logic.Oswaldo Chateaubriand - 2017 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 73 (3-4):989-1000.
Interpreted Logical Forms as Objects of the Attitudes.M. Dusche - 1995 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 4 (4):301-315.
Anti-Exceptionalism About Logic.Stephen Read - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Logic 16 (7):298.
The Epistemological Status of Logic.Lisa Ann Warenski - 2002 - Dissertation, City University of New York
Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. [REVIEW]R. W. J. - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (2):344-344.
Logical Partisanhood.Jack Woods - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (5):1203-1224.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-18

Total views
79 ( #148,350 of 2,520,404 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #58,681 of 2,520,404 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes