Cause and Norm

Journal of Philosophy 106 (11):587-612 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Much of the philosophical literature on causation has focused on the concept of actual causation, sometimes called token causation. In particular, it is this notion of actual causation that many philosophical theories of causation have attempted to capture.2 In this paper, we address the question: what purpose does this concept serve? As we shall see in the next section, one does not need this concept for purposes of prediction or rational deliberation. What then could the purpose be? We will argue that one can gain an important clue here by looking at the ways in which causal judgments are shaped by people‘s understanding of norms.

Similar books and articles

Cause, Fault, Norm.John Z. - 2008 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 15 (1):51-55.
Folk psychological concepts: Causation.Craig Roxborough & Jill Cumby - 2009 - Philosophical Psychology 22 (2):205-213.
Causal reasoning.Christoph Hoerl - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 152 (2):167-179.
How causal is downward causation?Menno Hulswit - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 36 (2):261 - 287.
Three Concepts of Actual Causation.Enno Fischer - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-22

Downloads
2,738 (#2,988)

6 months
192 (#19,170)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Christopher Hitchcock
California Institute of Technology
Joshua Knobe
Yale University

References found in this work

Knowledge and practical interests.Jason Stanley - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference.Judea Pearl - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 84 references / Add more references