Arguing for Questions

In Bart Garssen & Frans van Eemeren (eds.), From Argument Schemes to Argumentative Relations in the Wild: A Variety of Contributions to Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 167-184 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People sometimes argue for questions, as can be verified by a Web search using as search terms phrases consisting of a conclusion indicator and an interrogative particle. These arguments provide a reason for asking the question and thus try to establish that it needs to be answered. Typically, they do so either in order to motivate interest in discovering the answer or in order to challenge addressees or a third party to explain their behaviour. The “inferential erotetic logic” of the Polish logician Andrzej Wiśniewski provides a basis for evaluating the inferences in such arguments. For an inference from one or more statements to a question to be valid, the statements and the context must entail that the question has a true answer without entailing that any particular answer is true. Further, there must be a point to asking the question, such as the addressees’ ignorance of the correct answer to it; this requirement may be a pragmatic rather than a semantic constraint. Wiśniewski’s logic also covers inferences from questions to questions, but humans rarely articulate such inferences; this part of his logic is applicable to problem solving and proof theory rather than to arguments for questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Do Rights Look Like?David Shapiro - 2001 - Questions: Philosophy for Young People 1:11-11.
Arguing critical realism: The case of economics.Bjørn-Ivar Davidsen - 2005 - Journal of Critical Realism 4 (2):291-314.
What Do Rights Look Like?David Shapiro - 2001 - Questions 1:11-11.
What Do Rights Look Like?David Shapiro - 2001 - Questions 1:11-11.
Quine: Underdetermination and Naturalistic Metaphysics.Gary Kemp - 2015 - Philosophical Topics 43 (1-2):179-188.
Plato's ethics.Nicholas White - 2013 - In Roger Crisp (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Arguing about Gods. [REVIEW]William Lane Craig - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):435-442.
Existence questions.Amie L. Thomasson - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (1):63 - 78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-23

Downloads
12 (#929,405)

6 months
3 (#445,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references