Carl Schmitt's Decisionism

Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1987 (72):15-26 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since 1945 Western nations have witnessed a dramatic reduction in the variety of positions in political theory and jurisprudence. Political argument has been virtually reduced to contests within liberal-democratic theory. Even radicals now take representative democracy as their unquestioned point of departure. There are, of course, some benefits following from this restriction of political debate. Fascist, Nazi and Stalinist political ideologies are now beyond the pale. But the hegemony of liberal-democratic political argument tends to obscure the fact that we are thinking in terms which were already obsolete at die end of the 19th century

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-02

Downloads
50 (#310,395)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Enlightenment Liberalism and the Challenge of Pluralism.Matthew Jones - 2012 - Dissertation, Canterbury Christ Church University
Conflict as a Vocation.William Rasch - 2000 - Theory, Culture and Society 17 (6):1-32.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references