Philosophy 64 (248):219-243 (1989)

Abstract
Many years ago we often witnessed a testy insistence, on the part of some purist, that some very familiar philosophical ‘ism’ be defined before being discussed; when most people either thought that had been done already or were happy to wait for the discussion itself to identify the ‘ism’. The old new style, that featured those unexpected demands for definition, ended by trying people's patience in its turn. Today there is a widespread assumption that we know, well enough, what is meant in philosophy by Scepticism. Perhaps the majority view is something like this: The philosophical term Scepticism admittedly covers a number of different stances. The one that a given philosopher wants to discuss may or may not be the most like that of the original ancient Skeptics. Still the context normally makes it clear enough what is meant, and there is more point in discussing whatever thing is meant than in quarrelling about the name. As for the way, or ways, in which the word scepticism with a small s is used when people are not referring to any traditional philosophical position—we can safely disregard colloquial usage in this context. As a rule the main point is to see how, if at all, the Scepticism in question is best combated or refuted
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0031819100044491
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,703
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scepticism—Philosophical and Everyday.J. M. Hinton - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (248):219 - 243.
The Life and Learning of Arne Naess: Scepticism as a Survival Strategy.Inga Bostad - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):42-51.
Scepticism.Arne Naess - 1969 - New York: Humanities P..
Scepticism and Morality.Christopher Cherry - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (183):51 - 62.
Psychological and Social Aspects of Pyrrhonian Scepticism.Arne Naess - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):301 – 321.
Moral Scepticism: Why Ask "Why Should I Be Moral"?Richard Arnot Home Bett - 1986 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
On Some Attempted Criticism.R. F. Holland - 1973 - Philosophy 48 (185):293 - 295.
Philosophical Scepticism and Ordinary Beliefs.Gloria H. Eres - 1984 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Moral Scepticism and Inductive Scepticism.Robert Black - 1990 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 90:65 - 82.
Hume's Two Views of Modern Scepticism.Dario Castiglione - 2006 - History of European Ideas 32 (1):1-27.
Scepticism and Absurdity.Ingemund Gullvåg - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):163-190.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
27 ( #411,673 of 2,462,586 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,586 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes