More on Russell's hypothesis

Philosophy of Science 57 (4):703-711 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Previous articles on Russell's hypothesis and on criteria for scientific explanations are used as a springboard for analyzing some modern trends in science. Specifically, recent suggestions of the concept of "creation from nothing" in Big-Bang cosmology are compared to Russell's hypothesis, in light of James Woodward's criteria for an explanation purporting to be scientific. The discussion is then extended to the broader question of the direction of scientific theorizing, through examples showing that one generation's science may not build conformably upon the mindset of the previous generation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Lachman.Tim van Gelder - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):295-295.
Materialism as a scientific hypothesis.Ullin T. Place - 1960 - Philosophical Review 69 (January):101-4.
The search hypothesis of emotions.Dylan Evans - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (4):497-509.
Ayer and Russell on Naive Realism.Michael Bradie - 1976 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:175 - 181.
Bertrand Russell, the social scientist.Bertrand Russell (ed.) - 1973 - [Hyderabad, India: Bertrand Russell Supranational Society.
The age of the universe.Malcolm Acock - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):130-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#254,871)

6 months
25 (#111,330)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific explanation.James Woodward - 1979 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):41-67.
The age of the universe.Malcolm Acock - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (1):130-145.

Add more references