Value, reason and hedonism

Utilitas 20 (1):50-58 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is widely believed that we always have reason to maximize the good. Utilitarianism and other consequentialist theories depend on this conception of value. Scanlon has argued that this view of value is not generally correct, but that it is most plausible with regard to the value of pleasure, and may even be true at least of that. But there are reasons to think that even the value of pleasure is not teleological

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Happiness and pleasure.Daniel M. Haybron - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):501-528.
Intuitive hedonism.Joseph Endola - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (2):441 - 477.
Desire satisfactionism and hedonism.Chris Heathwood - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 128 (3):539-563.
David Baumgardt and ethical hedonism.Zeev Levy - 1989 - Hoboken, NJ: Ktav Pub. House.
Practical reason, value and action.Alison Hills - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):375-392.
The Hedonist's Dilemma.Dale Dorsey - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):173-196.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
157 (#117,410)

6 months
18 (#134,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alison Hills
Oxford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Add more references