Noûs 56 (2):443-472 (2022)

Authors
Tyler Hildebrand
Dalhousie University
Thomas Metcalf
Spring Hill College
Abstract
According to the Nomological Argument, observed regularities in nature are best explained by an appeal to a supernatural being. A successful explanation must avoid two perils. Some explanations provide too little structure, predicting a universe without regularities. Others provide too much structure, thereby precluding an explanation of certain types of lawlike regularities featured in modern scientific theories. We argue that an explanation based in the creative, intentional action of a supernatural being avoids these two perils whereas leading competitors do not. Although our argument falls short of a full defense, it does suggest that the Nomological Argument is worthy of philosophical attention.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/nous.12364
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Fact, Fiction, and Forecast.Nelson Goodman - 1955 - Harvard University Press.
Principia Ethica.George Edward Moore - 1903 - Dover Publications.
Laws and Symmetry.Bas C. Van Fraassen - 1989 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
New Work for a Theory of Universals.David Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.

View all 100 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Divine Lawmaker.John Foster - 2004 - Oxford University Press UK.
Nomological Realism, a Form of Nomo-theism.Roberto Miguel Azar - 2016 - Ideas Y Valores 65 (161):127-137.
The Argument From Design.R. G. Swinburne - 1968 - Philosophy 43 (165):199 - 212.
A Deductive-Nomological Model for Mathematical Scientific Explanation.Eduardo Castro - 2020 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 24 (1):1-27.
Gesetze Und Vollständige Erklärungen: Churchlands Verwechslung.Matthias Günther - 2004 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 67 (1):157-179.
Contrastive Explanation.Peter Lipton - 1990 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 27:247-266.
Jewish Survival, Divine Supervision, and the Existence of God.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Shofar: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Jewish Studies 30 (4):100-112.
Cosmological and Design Arguments.A. R. Pruss & Richard M. Gale - 2005 - In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 116--137.
Nomological and Transcendental Criteria for Scientific Laws.Predrag Šustar - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):533-544.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-03-02

Total views
588 ( #13,866 of 2,499,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
207 ( #2,603 of 2,499,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes