Remarks on the iconicity and interpretation of existential graphs

Semiotica 2011 (186):169-187 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In the 1890s, Peirce reformulated quantification theory by expressing it in a language of diagrams, called existential graphs. Peirce thought that the iconicity of his graphs made them suitable for analyzing logical reasoning. Iconic signs can be said to show their meaning, and this paper studies the ways in which graphs do this. Peirce's pragmatic analysis of propositions resembles game-theoretical semantics, and existential graphs show what they mean by displaying the structure of the semantic game for the proposition represented by a graph



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,179

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

10 (#931,743)

6 months
1 (#510,113)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Risto Hilpinen
University of Miami

Citations of this work

Peirce in Finland.Henrik Rydenfelt - 2014 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 6 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Reconstituting beta graphs into an efficacious system.Sun-Joo Shin - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (3):273-295.

Add more references