Peirce, Goodman and the Aesthetic Sign

Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):177-184 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Expressions of the form "s represents an F", "s represents t as G", and "s represents an F as G" are analysed by means of C. S. Peirce's and Nelson Goodman's semiotic theories, and these theories are compared with each other. It is argued that Peirce's concept of interpretant provides a plausible account of what Goodman calls the exemplification features of aesthetic signs (works of art).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce's theory of signs.Albert Atkin - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Teleology and Semiosis: Commentary on T. L. Short's Peirce's Theory of Signs.James Liszka - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):636-644.
Teleology and semiosis: Commentary on T. L. short's.James Jakób Liszka - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4).
Solution to the Problem of Induction: Peirce, Apel, and Goodman on the Grue Paradox.Jerold J. Abrams - 2002 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 38 (4):543 - 558.
Text semiotics.Dinda L. Gorlée - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:134-156.
Exemplification in Nelson Goodman's aesthetic theory.Henning Jensen - 1973 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):47-51.
Samples as symbols.Mark Textor - 2008 - Ratio 21 (3):344-359.
Christianity—Sign Among Signs?Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach - 1993 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (4):286 - 297.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
61 (#258,521)

6 months
9 (#290,637)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Risto Hilpinen
University of Miami

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references