Human Rights Review 9 (4):525-535 (2008)

Peter Higgins
Eastern Michigan University
This paper argues that the relevant unit of analysis for assessing the justice of an immigration policy is the socially-situated individual (as opposed to the individual simpliciter or the nation-state, for example). This methodological principle is demonstrated indirectly by showing how some liberal, cosmopolitan defenses of "open borders" and the alleged right of immigration fail by their own standards, owing to the implicit adoption of an inappropriate unit of analysis.
Keywords immigration  open borders  cosmopolitanism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12142-008-0068-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

More Open Borders and Deep Structural Transformation.Adam James Tebble - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is the Right to Exclude Immigrants?Sune Lægaard - 2010 - Res Publica 16 (3):245-262.
Freedom, Immigration, and Adequate Options.Javier S. Hidalgo - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (2):1-23.
An Immigration-Pressure Model of Global Distributive Justice.Eric Cavallero - 2006 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (1):97-127.
The Open Borders Debate on Immigration.Shelley Wilcox - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):813-821.
Culture and Immigration: A Case for Exclusion?Alex Sager - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:69-86.
Immigration, Association, and the Family.Matthew Lister - 2010 - Law and Philosophy 29 (6):717-745.


Added to PP index

Total views
2,274 ( #1,882 of 2,518,150 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
52 ( #15,860 of 2,518,150 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes