Could Intelligent Computers Postulate Their Own Evolution Theory Which Would Be More Plausible than that of the Humans?

Open Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):23-27 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How did life come into existence on Earth? Although many scientific theories and hypotheses have been drawn, we have not yet been able to provide a detailed answer to this fundamental question. What if intelligent computers would someday be in a condition to postulate their own evolution theory which would explain how they came into the world, how would this theory look like? And how would it stand in comparison to the humans’ theory? Let us suppose that a thousand years from now, intelligent and self-aware computers who, for any reason whatsoever, had lost all contacts with humans, and had continued to self-develop and improve by themselves, slowly began to wonder about how they came into the world? These intelligent computers may eventually develop a coherent theory of evolution, which would seemingly explain their existence. How would their theory stand in comparison to our theory of evolution? Would it be less comprehensive or viable? Taking into consideration the inorganic nature of computers, their relative simplicity compared to the human body, and the closeness of their components to the surrounding inorganic environment, it would not be a surprise if their theory would be more plausible than that of the humans. So, what would this signify and mean to our scientific theories in general?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Intelligent design in cultural evolution.Lee Cronk - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):352-353.
Life and Evolution in Computers.Melanie Mitchell - 2001 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 23 (3/4):361 - 383.
Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW]Sahotra Sarkar - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
Self-Recognition and Countermemory.Eric Steinhart - 1989 - Philosophy Today 33 (4):302-317.
Is it language that makes humans intelligent?Jo Van Herwegen & Annette Karmiloff-Smith - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):298-298.
God, Evolution, and Design.Loren Haarsma - 2010 - In Melville Y. Stewart (ed.), Science and Religion in Dialogue. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 168--180.
The Pros and Cons of 'Intelligent Design'.Martin Poulsom - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (2):175-191.
Does Animal Ethics Need a Darwinian Revolution?Whitley R. P. Kaufman - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):807-818.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-13

Downloads
27 (#576,320)

6 months
2 (#1,240,909)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references