Second-order properties and three varieties of functionalism

Philosophical Studies 153 (3):397 - 415 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper investigates whether there is an acceptable version of Functionalism that avoids commitment to second-order properties. I argue that the answer is "no". I consider two reductionist versions of Functionalism, and argue that both are compatible with multiple realization as such. There is a more specific type of multiple realization that poses difficulties for these views, however. The only apparent Functionalist solution is to accept second-order properties

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against A Posteriori Functionalism.Marc A. Moffett - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):83-106.
Levels, orders and the causal status of mental properties.Simone Gozzano - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):347-362.
Some varieties of functionalism.Sydney Shoemaker - 1981 - Philosophical Topics 12 (1):93-119.
European Functionalism.Sven Rosenkranz - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):229 - 249.
Role Functionalism and Epiphenomenalism.Dwayne Moore - 2011 - Philosophia 39 (3):511-525.
Symposium on Mechanisms in Mind.Carl Gillett - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:1-2.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-24

Downloads
142 (#128,099)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Hiddleston
Wayne State University

References found in this work

A Materialist Theory of the Mind.D. M. Armstrong - 1968 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Ted Honderich.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
Physicalism, or Something Near Enough.Jaegwon Kim - 2005 - Princeton University Press.
From an ontological point of view.John Heil - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references