Philosophy Compass (forthcoming)

Authors
Dick Timmer
Dortmund University
Abstract
The complexities of how justice comes to be realized, and by which agents, is a relatively neglected element in contemporary theories of justice. This has left several crucial questions about agency and justice undertheorized, such as why some particular agents are responsible for realizing justice, how their contribution towards realizing justice should be understood, and what role agents such as activists and community leaders play in realizing justice. We aim to contribute towards a better understanding of the landscape of these kinds of questions. First, we argue that theorists should distinguish between (i) agents who are responsible for realizing justice, but not committed to it, (ii) agents who are not responsible for realizing justice, but who are committed to it, and (iii) agents who are both responsible for and committed to realizing justice. Second, we discuss how to incorporate agents of justice more robustly into theorizing about justice.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/phc3.12770
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Responsibility for Justice.Iris Marion Young - 2011 - Oxford University Press USA.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.Richard J. Arneson - 1989 - Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare.Ronald Dworkin - 1981 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (3):185-246.

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Limitarianism?Ingrid Robeyns - 2022 - Wiley: Journal of Political Philosophy 30 (2):249-270.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Vague Eschatology.Michael J. Almeida - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):359-375.
Transnational Women's Collectivities and Global Justice.Hye-Ryoung Kang - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (3):359-377.
Pauvreté globale: Apports d'une critique féministe des approches de Singer et Pogge.Roxane Noël - 2016 - In Théories de la justice: Justice globale, agents de la justice et justice de genre. Louvain: pp. 335-341.
Ranking Agents of Justice: When Should the Corporation Act?Athol Williams - 2018 - St Antony's International Review 14 (1):83-102.
Reply: Clubbish Justice.Kai Spiekermann - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):447-453.
Agents of Justice.Onora O'Neill - 2001 - Metaphilosophy 32 (1-2):180-195.
Justice and Feasibility: A Dynamic Approach.Pablo Gilabert - 2017 - In K. Vallier & M. Weber (eds.), Political Utopias: Contemporary Debates. Oxford University Press. pp. 95-126.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-09-10

Total views
74 ( #154,448 of 2,499,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #39,194 of 2,499,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes