Connotation and Frege's Semantic Dualism

History of Philosophy Quarterly 36 (4):377-398 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The traditional distinction between Millian and Fregean theories of names presupposes that what Mill calls ‘connotation’ lines up with what Frege calls ‘sense.’ This presupposition is false. Mill’s talk of connotation is an attempt to bring into view the line of thought that crystallizes in Frege’s distinction between concept and object. This latter is the semantic dualism of my title.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mill-Frege Compatibalism.John Justice - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:567-576.
John Stuart Mill's Theory of Meaning.William Eugene Hopkins - 1979 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Mill-Frege Compatibalism.John Justice - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:567-576.
The Unsatisfactoriness of Unsaturatedness.Danny Frederick - 2016 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), Philosophy and Logic of Predication. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Frege and the Description Theory: An Attempt at Rehabilitation.Ari Maunu - 2015 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 92 (1):109-116.
Sense-only-signs: Frege on fictional proper names.Mark Textor - 2011 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 82 (1):375-400.
Frege’s Distinction Between Sense and Reference.Gideon Makin - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (2):147-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-08-14

Downloads
70 (#225,606)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael R. Hicks
Miami University, Ohio

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references