The Philosophers on the Market Square. Philosophical Modernism from Vienna to Uppsala

Abstract

: The logical empiricists in Vienna and their Swedish counterparts in Uppsala shared a scientific ethos that underlined the philosophical academics as representatives for universalism, disinterest, professional loyalty, organized scepticism and public interest. Rudolf Carnap, Axel Hägerström and Ingemar Hedenius regarded themselves as intellectuals, offering their philosophical tools to society. However, when the scientific ethos was articulated by Robert Merton in 1942, the circumstances had drastically changed. The European tradition was left behind. However, the claim is that neither the professionalism, nor the specialized epistemology in analytical philosophy necessarily alienated the philosopher from the public. The gap occurred when the epistemology ceased to be cultural meaningful, as a part of the spirit of the time. The modernistic spirit promoted the ethos of intellectuality. In the 1960s a new ethos took over: the philosophers as purely academic professional experts, in US and Sweden.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The Left Vienna Circle, Part 1. Carnap, Neurath, and the Left Vienna Circle thesis.Sarah S. Richardson - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):14-24.
From the Values of Scientific Philosophy to the Value Neutrality of the Philosophy of Science.David Stump - 2002 - In Michael Heidelberger & Friedrich Stadler (eds.), History of Philosophy of Science: New Trends and Perspectives. pp. 147-158.
Writing Philosophy for the Public is a Moral Obligation.Greg Littmann - 2014 - Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):103-116.
The French Connection: Conventionalism and the Vienna Circle.Anastasios Brenner - 2001 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 9:277-286.
The First Vienna Circle: Myth or Reality?Christoph Limbeck-Lilienau - 2018 - Hungarian Philosophical Review 62 (4):50-65.
The Cambridge Companion to Carnap.Michael Friedman & Richard Creath (eds.) - 2007 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-13

Downloads
6 (#1,434,892)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Overcoming Metaphysics: Carnap and Heidegger.M. Friedman - forthcoming - Origins of Logical Empiricism:45--79.
The Ethos of Science.Robert Merton - 1996 - In Piotr Sztompka (ed.), On Social Structure and Science. University of Chicago Press. pp. 267-76.
Otto Neurath: Philosophy between Science and Politics.Nancy Cartwright, Jordi Cat, Lola Fleck & Thomas E. Uebel - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):306-309.
The Logic of Nonsense.G. P. Henderson - 1952 - Philosophical Quarterly 2 (9):378-379.

View all 7 references / Add more references