Objective, subjective and intersubjective selectors of knowledge

Evolution and Cognition 1 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is argued that the acceptance of knowledge in a community depends on several, approximately independent selection "criteria". The objective criteria are distinctiveness, invariance and controllability, the subjective ones are individual utility, coherence, simplicity and novelty, and the intersubjective ones are publicity, expressivity, formality, collective utility, conformity and authority. Science demarcates itself from other forms of knowledge by explicitly controlling for the objective criteria.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nagel on subjective and objective.V. Haksar - 1981 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (March):105-21.
Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. [REVIEW]David Hildebrand - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 57 (2):395-398.
Subjective, intersubjective, objective.Hans-Johann Glock - 2003 - Philosophical Investigations 26 (4).
Subjective, intersubjective, objective.John Mcdowell - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):675–681.
Subjective and objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal questions. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
Why Are There No Objective Values? A Critique of Ethical Intuitionism from an Epistemological Point of View.Gebhard Geiger - 1995 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (1):35 - 62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#330,292)

6 months
2 (#1,157,335)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francis Heylighen
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references