- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Matching and maximizing in concurrent schedules
Psychological Review 86 (5):496-500 (1979)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive “Two-Armed Bandit” Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing.Gene M. Heyman, Katherine A. Grisanzio & Victor Liang - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
The solution of two concurrent, matching-(or non-matching)-to-sample, and same-different discrimination learnings relies on a common underlying process in rats.Esho Nakagawa - 2002 - In Serge P. Shohov (ed.), Advances in Psychology Research. Nova Science Publishers. pp. 15--67.
Response independence, matching and maximizing: A reply to Heyman.J. E. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (5):501-505.
Concurrent schedules of response duration.Gerald D. Lachter - 1984 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 22 (4):362-364.
Changeover contingencies and sensitivity to reinforcement on multiple concurrent schedules.Lr Dreyfus, D. Deportocallan & Sa Pesillo - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):523-524.
Choice between shock-free times in concurrent avoidance schedules.Paul Lewis, Laurie Moon & Larrie Hutton - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (5):395-398.
Concurrent sequential matching in the pigeon.Richard Pisacreta - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (3):183-186.
How to decide between matching and maximizing: A reply to Prelec.Howard Rachlin - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):376-379.
On matching and maximizing in operant choice experiments.J. E. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1978 - Psychological Review 85 (5):436-444.
Matching, maximizing, and the hyperbolic reinforcement feedback function.Dražen Prelec - 1982 - Psychological Review 89 (3):189-230.
"On Matching and Maximizing in Operant Choice Experiments": Correction.J. E. R. Staddon & Susan Motheral - 1979 - Psychological Review 86 (2):156-156.
Reinforcer and ratio requirement effects in concurrent fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules.Keith A. Wood & Richard D. Willis - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (6):541-543.
Matching versus maximizing: Comments on Prelec's paper.John H. Kagel, Raymond C. Battalio & Leonard Green - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (4):380-384.
On the existence of fair matching algorithms.F. Masarani & S. S. Gokturk - 1989 - Theory and Decision 26 (3):305-322.
Generalization gradients around stimuli associated with different reinforcement schedules.Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):335.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
2016-06-30
Downloads
5 (#1,469,565)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo