Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 30 (2):207-227 (2015)
AbstractWhat makes a high-quality biomarker experiment? The success of personalized medicine hinges on the answer to this question. In this paper, I argue that judgment about the quality of biomarker experiments is mediated by the problem of theoretical underdetermination. That is, the network of biological and pathophysiological theories motivating a biomarker experiment is sufficiently complicated that it often frustrates valid interpretation of the experimental results. Drawing on a case-study in biomarker diagnostic development from neurooncology, I argue that this problem of underdetermination can be overcome with greater coordination across the biomarker research trajectory. I then sketch an account for how coordination across a research trajectory can be evaluated. I ultimate conclude that what makes a high-quality biomarker experiment must be judged by the epistemic contribution it makes to this coordinated research effort.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Exposing the Vanities—and a Qualified Defense—of Mechanistic Reasoning in Health Care Decision Making.Jeremy Howick - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):926-940.
Evidence: Philosophy of Science Meets Medicine.John Worrall - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):356-362.
Questioning the Methodologic Superiority of 'Placebo' Over 'Active' Controlled Trials.Jeremy Howick - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (9):34-48.
Current Epistemological Problems in Evidence Based Medicine.R. E. Ashcroft - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (2):131-135.
Similar books and articles
Understanding Preferences for Disclosure of Individual Biomarker Results Among Participants in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort.S. E. Wilson, E. R. Baker, A. C. Leonard, M. H. Eckman & B. P. Lanphear - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (12):736-740.
Pre-Emptive Suicide, Precedent Autonomy and Preclinical Alzheimer Disease.Rebecca Dresser - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8):550-551.
Biomarker Development: Prudence, Risk, and Reproducibility.Edward R. Dougherty - 2012 - Bioessays 34 (4):277-279.
Networked Coordination: Effect of Network Structure Human Subjects' Ability to Solve Coordination Problem.Ramamohan Paturi, Mathew D. McCubbins & Nicholas Weller - unknown
Reckoning the Shape of Everything: Underdetermination and Cosmotopology.P. D. Magnus - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (3):541-557.
Religious Values Informing Halal Meat Production and the Control and Delivery of Halal Credence Quality.Karijn Bonne & Wim Verbeke - 2008 - Agriculture and Human Values 25 (1):35-47.
Hidden Underdetermination: A Case Study in Classical Electrodynamics.Wolfgang Pietsch - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (2):125-151.
Evidence for Assortative Mating on Digit Ratio (2d:4d), a Biomarker for Prenatal Androgen Exposure.Martin Voracek, Stefan G. Dressler & John T. Manning - 2007 - Journal of Biosocial Science 39 (4):599-612.
Breaking the Ties: Epistemic Significance, Bacilli, and Underdetermination.Dana Tulodziecki - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):627-641.
Thought Experiments in Ethics: A Contextualist Approach to the Grounding Problem.Leslie Anne Harland - 1999 - Dissertation, The University of British Columbia (Canada)
Underdetermination, Methodological Practices, and Realism.Dana Tulodziecki - 2013 - Synthese 190 (17):3731-3750.
Experimental Evidence of the Emergence of Aesthetic Rules in Pure Coordination Games.Federica Alberti - manuscript