Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (2):185-194 (2015)

Abstract
This article views the Hippocratic Oath from a new perspective and draws consequences for modern health care. The Oath consists of two parts, a family-like alliance where the teacher of the “art” is equal to a father and a set of maxims how the “art” is to be practiced. Self-commitments stated before the gods tie the parts together and give the alliance trustworthiness. One might call this a proto-profession. Modern physicians form a similar alliance. Specific knowledge and skills and specific action guiding rules are elements of a profession but its trustworthiness rests on a combination of professional autonomy and public control. In order to be granted autonomy the profession must show some effort in enforcing its specific rules and in order to do so its members need to be convinced of the intrinsic value of their profession. Whereas in antiquity physicians acted as single individuals the modern alliance is shaped by division of labour. Physicians use each other and other professions by mutual consent and the health care system as means in the diagnostic-therapeutic process. As any actor is reponsible for the means he uses physicians are co-responsible accordingly. Thus, professional conduct now entails care for the organisation of the alliance as detailed in the “Charter on Medical Professionalism”. The effort the profession gives to this task will confirm its trustworthiness.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-014-9589-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,160
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Die Athenische Demokratie.P. J. Rhodes & J. Bleicken - 1987 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 107:232-232.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Psychopathy: Morally Incapacitated Persons.Heidi Maibom - 2017 - In Thomas Schramme & Steven Edwards (eds.), Handbook of the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 1109-1129.
Ethical Conflicts in Patient-Centred Care.Sven Ove Hansson & Barbro Fröding - forthcoming - Sage Publications: Clinical Ethics.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Hippocratic, Religious, and Secular Ethics: The Points of Conflict.Robert M. Veatch - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):33-43.
The Hippocratic Thorn in Bioethics' Hide: Cults, Sects, and Strangeness.T. Koch - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (1):75-88.
Resurrection of the Hippocratic Oath in Russia.Pavel Tichtchenko - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (1):49.
Should We Study the Hippocratic Oath?R. M. Veatch - 1990 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 1 (4):291.
Hippocratic Oath.H. W. Miller - 1944 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 38:6-7.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-07

Total views
7 ( #1,064,127 of 2,499,389 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #418,195 of 2,499,389 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes