Epistemology's Paradox: Is a Theory of Knowledge Possible?

Authors
Stephen Hetherington
University of New South Wales
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2108431
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowledge Puzzles: An Introduction to Epistemology.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 1996 - Westview Press.
Reality? Knowledge? Philosophy!: An Introduction to Metaphysics and Epistemology.Stephen Hetherington - 2003 - Edinburgh University Press.
Epistemology Futures.Stephen Hetherington (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Stephen Cade Hetherington, Epistemology's Paradox. [REVIEW]Anne Jacobson - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13:24-26.
Good Knowledge, Bad Knowledge: On Two Dogmas of Epistemology.Stephen Cade Hetherington - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
Stephen Cade Hetherington, Epistemology's Paradox Reviewed By.Anne Jaap Jacobson - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (1):24-26.
Feminist Epistemology and American Pragmatism: Dewey and Quine.Alexandra L. Shuford - 2010 - Continuum.
Comments on Moore's Paradox and Self-Knowledge.Rogers Albritton - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):229-239.
Moore’s Paradox and Self-Knowledge.Sydney Shoemaker - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 77 (2-3):211-28.
The Bias Paradox in Feminist Standpoint Epistemology.Kristina Rolin - 2006 - Episteme 3 (1-2):125-136.
Epistemic Logic and Epistemology.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2008 - In Vincent F. Hendricks & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave-Macmillan.
McKinsey Paradoxes, Radical Skepticism, and the Transmission of Knowledge Across Known Entailments.Duncan Pritchard - 2002 - Synthese 130 (2):279-302.
The Theory of Knowledge: A Thematic Introduction.Paul K. Moser (ed.) - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Knowledge: The Philosophical Quest in History.Steve Fuller - 2014 - Routledge.
Epistemic Logic and Epistemology.Wesley H. Holliday - forthcoming - In Sven Ove Hansson Vincent F. Hendricks (ed.), Handbook of Formal Philosophy. Springer.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
14 ( #735,623 of 2,520,893 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,457 of 2,520,893 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes



Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct

CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-584f896dc5-f4fhm N