Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3):1633-1653 (2020)
Abstract |
The problem of developing research and innovation in accordance with society’s general needs and values has received increasing attention in research policy. In the last 7 years, the concept of “Responsible Research and Innovation” has gained prominence in this regard, along with the resulting question of how best to integrate awareness about science–society relations into daily practices in research and higher education. In this context, post-graduate training has been seen as a promising entrance point, but tool-kit approaches more frequently have been used. In this paper, we present and analyze an experiment—in the format of a Ph.D. course for early-career researchers—deploying an alternative approach. Drawing on Argyris and Schön’s framing of reflective practice, and their distinctions between espoused theories and theories-in-use, the analyzed course endeavored to stimulate double-loop learning. Focusing on dislocatory moments, this paper analyses how the course tried to teach participants to reflect upon their own practices, values, and ontologies, and whether this provided them with the resources necessary to reflect on their theories-in-use in their daily practices.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11948-020-00208-2 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.Bruno Latour - 2004 - Critical Inquiry 30 (2):225-248.
The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.V. Blok & P. Lemmens - 2015 - In Bert- Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swiwestra & Jeroen Van Den Hoven (eds.), Responsible Innovation 2: Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. pp. 19-35.
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.Barbara E. Ribeiro, Robert D. J. Smith & Kate Millar - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1):81-103.
What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. [REVIEW]Daan Schuurbiers - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):769-788.
View all 13 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Putting Responsible Research and Innovation Into Practice: A Case Study for Biotechnology Research, Exploring Impacts and RRI Learning Outcomes of Public Engagement for Science Students.Janice Limson - 2018 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 19):4685-4710.
Modeling Conceptualization and Investigating Teaching Effectiveness.Jérôme Santini, Tracy Bloor & Gérard Sensevy - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (9-10):921-961.
The Role of History and Philosophy in Research on Teaching and Learning of Relativity.Olivia Levrini - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. pp. 157-181.
Rethinking Contexts for Learning and Teaching: Communities, Activites and Networks.Richard Edwards, Gert Biesta & Mary Thorpe (eds.) - 2009 - Routledge.
The Value of False Theories in Science Education.Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam - 2019 - Science & Education 28 (1-2):5-23.
Teaching for Active Citizenship: Research Insights From the Fields of Teaching Moral Values and Personal Epistemology in Early Years Classrooms.Joanne Lunn Brownlee, Susan Walker, Eva Johansson & Laura Scholes - 2016 - Routledge.
Utilizing Professional Vision in Supporting Preservice Teachers’ Learning About Contextualized Scientific Practices.Asli Sezen-Barrie - 2018 - Science & Education 27 (1-2):159-182.
Science Outside the Lab: Helping Graduate Students in Science and Engineering Understand the Complexities of Science Policy.Michael J. Bernstein, Kiera Reifschneider, Ira Bennett & Jameson M. Wetmore - 2017 - Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (3):861-882.
What Happens in the Lab: Applying Midstream Modulation to Enhance Critical Reflection in the Laboratory. [REVIEW]Daan Schuurbiers - 2011 - Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4):769-788.
History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science and Science-Technology-Society Traditions in Science Education: Continuities and Discontinuities.Veli-Matti Vesterinen, María-Antonia Manassero-Mas & Ángel Vázquez-Alonso - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1895-1925.
Epistemic Beliefs and Beliefs About Teaching Practices for Moral Learning in the Early Years of School: Relationships and Complexities.Jo Lunn Brownlee, Eva Johansson, Charlotte Cobb-Moore, Gillian Boulton-Lewis, Sue Walker & Joanne Ailwood - unknown
Modes of Knowing and Modes of Coming to Know Knowledge Creation and Co-Construction as Socio-Epistemological Engineering in Educational Processes.M. F. Peschl - 2006 - Constructivist Foundations 1 (3):111-123.
Nature of Science Contextualized: Studying Nature of Science with Scientists.Veli-Matti Vesterinen & Suvi Tala - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (4):435-457.
Developing Essential Competencies of Sustainability Educators.Patricia Grant, Marjo Lips-Wiersma & Vidayana Soebagio - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 14:241-259.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-03-20
Total views
6 ( #1,133,688 of 2,507,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,669 )
2020-03-20
Total views
6 ( #1,133,688 of 2,507,669 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,669 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads