John Robert Seeley, Natural Religion, and the Victorian Conflict between Science and Religion

Journal of the History of Ideas 79 (2):309-329 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines the publishing and reception of J. R. Seeley’s Natural Religion, a book that sought to bring about a reconciliation between science and religion. While Natural Religion has long been overlooked, it is argued that its reception gives us insight into changing views about the relationship between science and religion in the late Victorian period. The essay also explores how the reception of the book was conditioned by its bibliographic lineage as it was signed not by Seeley, but “by the Author of Ecce Homo.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Plight of Aesthetics in Iran.Heidari Majid - 2016 - Contemporary Aesthetics 14.
Explanatory modesty.Robert N. McCauley - 2014 - Zygon 49 (3):728-740.
Adam Smith: Philosophy, Science, and Social Science.D. D. Raphael - 1978 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 12:77-93.
Religia i nauka: dwie prawdy?Andrzej Bronk - 2006 - Filozofia Nauki 1.
Are science and religion natural enemies?Peter G. Woolcock - 2012 - The Australian Humanist 108 (108):1.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-16

Downloads
19 (#775,535)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural religion.Edmund Gurney - 1883 - Mind 8 (30):198-221.

Add more references