Hastings Center Report 50 (6):27-38 (2020)
AbstractMany instances of scientific research impose risks, not just on participants and scientists but also on third parties. This class of social risks unifies a range of problems previously treated as distinct phenomena, including so-called bystander risks, biosafety concerns arising from gain-of-function research, the misuse of the results of dual-use research, and the harm caused by inductive risks. The standard approach to these problems has been to extend two familiar principles from human subjects research regulations—a favorable risk-benefit ratio and informed consent. We argue, however, that these moral principles will be difficult to satisfy in the context of widely distributed social risks about which affected parties may reasonably disagree. We propose that framing these risks as political rather than moral problems may offer another way. By borrowing lessons from political philosophy, we propose a framework that unifies our discussion of social risks and the possible solutions to them.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Science in a Democratic Society.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 101:95-112.
Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives.Susan Babbitt & Sandra Harding - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (2):287.
Similar books and articles
Canadian Research Ethics Boards, MRI Research Risks, and MRI Risk Classification.Jennifer Marshall & Michael Hadskis - 2009 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (4):9-15.
Assessing Social Risks Prior to Commencement of a Clinical Trial: Due Diligence or Ethical Inflation?Scott Burris & Corey Davis - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):48-54.
Assessing Research Risks Systematically: The Net Risks Test.D. Wendler & F. G. Miller - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (8):481-486.
Third-Party Risks in Research: Should IRBs Address Them?Daniel Hausman - 2007 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 29 (3).
Vulnerability in Clinical Research with Patients in Pain: A Risk Analysis.Raymond C. Tait - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):59-72.
Financial Risks and Social Justice – Three Perspectives.Teppo Eskelinen - 2016 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 63 (148):1-16.
Limits on Risks for Healthy Volunteers in Biomedical Research.David B. Resnik - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (2):137-149.
The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 3. Balancing Potential Social Benefits Against Risks to Subjects.Sarah J. L. Edwards - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):96-100.
On the Alleged Right to Participate in High‐Risk Research.Joanna Różyńska - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (7):451-461.
Is There an Objective Way to Compare Research Risks?John Rossi & Robert M. Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):423-427.
The Concept of Risk and Responsible Conduct of Research.Eugenijus Gefenas - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):75-83.
Defining Research Risk in Standard of Care Trials: Lessons From SUPPORT.Joel K. Press & Caryn J. Rogers - 2017 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 42 (2):184-198.