Security, Planning and Justice: A Reply to Mintz-Woo

Ethics, Policy and Environment 21 (3):387-390 (2018)

Abstract

In a recent paper, I argued that the mere risk of climate-related harm was itself a harm, since it undermined the security of individuals subject to that risk. In his commentary, Mintz-Woo argues that my account of the value of security is mistaken. On his view, the value of belief-relative security is already well captured by standard theories of wellbeing, and the value of fact-relative security is illusory. In the following, I attempt to respond to his concerns. First, I argue contrary to Mintz-Woo that the literature on the cognitive effect on poverty is relevant to an assessment of the value of belief-relative security. Second, I introduce a distinction between ex ante and ex post perspectives on justice, and show that straightforward prioritarian commitments motivate an ex ante concern for fact-relative security.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,660

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-02-20

Downloads
16 (#671,315)

6 months
1 (#388,784)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Similar books and articles

Health Security and Risk Aversion.Jonathan Herington - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (7):479-489.
Hobbes's Knowledge of the Law: A Reply.Samuel I. Mintz - 1970 - Journal of the History of Ideas 31 (4):614.
Security, Exclusion, and Social Justice.Willem De Lint - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):1-7.
The Fascist Moment: Security, Exclusion, Extermination.Mark Neocleous - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):23-37.
Security as a Selective Project.Alice Hills - 2009 - Studies in Social Justice 3 (1):79-97.

Author's Profile

Jonathan Herington
University of Rochester

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations