Rhees on the Unity of Language

Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):224-237 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Rush Rhees held Wittgenstein's work in high esteem but considered it in need of deepening. He was critical of Wittgenstein's idea that the builders' game might be the whole language of a tribe and that human language could be thought of as simply a range of language games. Rhees thought that Wittgenstein failed to do justice to the unity of language. The idea of the unity of language appears to have both an anthropological and an ethical aspect. The latter is illustrated with the help of a Hemingway story



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,726

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Wittgenstein and the Possibility of Discourse.D. Z. Phillips (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein and the possibility of discourse.Rush Rhees - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by D. Z. Phillips.
4 Playing well.David Egan - 2013 - In Emily Ryall (ed.), The philosophy of play. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. pp. 54.
Rush Rhees on Wittgenstein and “What Language Is”.Hugh A. Knott - 2013 - Philosophical Investigations 37 (3):228-245.
Dogtooth and Wittgenstein's builders: A future in language?Daniel Simons - 2022 - Philosophical Investigations 46 (4):438-461.
Discussions of Wittgenstein. [REVIEW]V. W. J. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):366-367.
Wittgenstein on Verification and Private Languages.J. S. Clegg - 1975 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 5 (sup2):205-213.


Added to PP

58 (#274,033)

6 months
8 (#528,404)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lars Hertzberg
Åbo Akademi University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references