Ethical Principles vs. Ethical Rules

Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):499-523 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent calls have been made to move professional standards to a more principles-based perspective, supposing that emphasizing broad principles would eliminate the legalistic focus that rules may encourage, and accountants’ behavior would be more ethical and uniformly so. However, this supposition has yet to be empirically tested. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct (Code) provides guidance in both forms: principles and rules. This experiment examines how the form of the Code affects independence judgments in a client acceptance context. We also examine the potential for levels of moral development to influence the effectiveness of the Code.We find that subjects are more likely to consider their independence impaired, and are more likely to reject a questionable audit engagement, when rules-based (principles-based) reasoners are provided with Code rules (principles). Given the popularity of the view that rules-based standards are undesirable, these findings have significant implications for the profession as principles-based ethical standards are discussed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethical Principles vs. Ethical Rules.Terri L. Herron & David L. Gilbertson - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (3):499-523.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-09

Downloads
40 (#377,327)

6 months
8 (#283,518)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?