Philosophical Forum 40 (3):309-337 (2009)
AbstractWestern democracy theorists accept the "liberal democracy thesis" and claim that the only morally justifiable conception of democracy is liberal democracy regulated by substantive liberal values. According to this thesis, democracy not regulated by liberal values in nonliberal nations, if at all feasible, necessarily leads to the oppression of minorities and is therefore morally unjustifiable. This article aims to refute the liberal democracy thesis by arguing that democracy in "decent" nonliberal nations is not only feasible but also morally justifiable.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Faintest Passion.Harry Frankfurt - 1992 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (3):5-16.
Immigration and the Significance of Culture.Samuel Scheffler - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (2):93–125.
Similar books and articles
Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity.Enzo Rossi - 2008 - Human Affairs 18 (1):10-22.
Liberal Presumptions: A Response to Curtis.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (3):341-47.
The Government of the Peoples: On the Idea and Principles of Multilateral Democracy.Francis Cheneval - 2011 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
Pragmatist Politics: Making the Case for Liberal Democracy.John McGowan - 2012 - University of Minnesota Press.
Liberal Democracy and Political Islam: The Search for Common Ground.Mostapha Benhenda - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (1):88-115.
Cultural Claims and the Limits of Liberal Democracy.Ranjoo Seodu Herr - 2008 - Social Theory and Practice 34 (1):25-48.