Comparativism and the Grounds for Person-Centered Care and Shared Decision Making
Journal of Clinical Ethics 28 (4):269-278 (2017)
AbstractThis article provides a new argument and a new value-theoretical ground for person-centered care and shared decision making that ascribes to it the role of enabling rational choice in situations involving clinical choice. Rather than referring to good health outcomes and/or ethical grounds such as patient autonomy, it argues that a plausible justification and ground for person-centered care and shared decision making is preservation of rationality in the face of comparative non-determinacy in clinical settings. Often, no alternative treatment will be better than or equal to every other alternative. In the face of such comparative non-determinacy, Ruth Chang has argued that we can make rational decisions by invoking reasons that are created through acts of willing. This article transfers this view to clinical decision making and argues that shared decision making provides a solution to non-determinacy problems in clinical settings. This view of the role of shared decision making provides a new understanding of its nature, and it also allows us to better understand when caregivers should engage in shared decision making and when they should not.
Similar books and articles
Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (4):289-310.
Shared Decision-Making, Gender and New Technologies.Kristin Zeiler - 2007 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (3):279-287.
Deciding Together? Best Interests and Shared Decision-Making in Paediatric Intensive Care.Giles Birchley - 2014 - Health Care Analysis 22 (3):203-222.
Shared Decision Making, Paternalism and Patient Choice.Lars Sandman & Christian Munthe - 2010 - Health Care Analysis 18 (1):60-84.
Person Centred Care and Shared Decision Making: Implications for Ethics, Public Health and Research.Christian Munthe, Lars Sandman & Daniela Cutas - 2012 - Health Care Analysis 20 (3):231-249.
Adherence, Shared Decision-Making and Patient Autonomy.Lars Sandman, Bradi B. Granger, Inger Ekman & Christian Munthe - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (2):115-127.
The Concept of Negotiation in Shared Decision Making.Lars Sandman - 2009 - Health Care Analysis 17 (3):236-243.
The Re-Contextualization of the Patient: What Home Health Care Can Teach Us About Medical Decision-Making.Erica K. Salter - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (2):143-156.
The Opportunities and Challenges for Shared Decision-Making in the Rural United States.William A. Nelson, Paul J. Barr & Mary G. Castaldo - 2015 - HEC Forum 27 (2):157-170.
Aligning Ethics with Medical Decision-Making: The Quest for Informed Patient Choice.Benjamin Moulton & Jaime S. King - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (1):85-97.
The Importance of Communication in Collaborative Decision Making: Facilitating Shared Mind and the Management of Uncertainty.Mary C. Politi & Richard L. Street - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):579-584.
Decision Making Near the End of Life: Issues, Development, and Future Directions.James L. Werth & Dean Blevins (eds.) - 2008 - Brunner-Routledge.
Patient Autonomy and the Challenge of Clinical Uncertainty.Mark Parascandola, Jennifer Hawkins & Marion Danis - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):245-264.
Measuring Improved Patient Choice.Margaret Holmes‐Rovner & David R. Rovner - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (3):263-272.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.