When is a conclusion worth deriving? A relevance-based analysis of indeterminate relational problems
Thinking and Reasoning 8 (1):1-20 (2002)
AbstractWhen is a conclusion worth deriving? We claim that a conclusion is worth deriving to the extent that it is relevant in the sense of relevance theory (Sperber & Wilson, 1995). To support this hypothesis, we experiment with ''indeterminate relational problems'' where we ask participants what, if anything, follows from premises such as A is taller than B, A is taller than C . With such problems, the indeterminate response that nothing follows is common, and we explain why. We distinguish several types of determinate conclusions and show that their rate is a function of their relevance. We argue that by appropriately changing the formulation of the premises, the relevance of determinate conclusions can be increased, and the rate of indeterminate responses thereby reduced. We contrast these relevance-based predictions with predictions based on linguistic congruence.
Similar books and articles
Mental model theory versus the inference rule approach in relational reasoning.Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):193 – 203.
To appraise developmental difficulty or mental demand, relational complexity is not enough.Juan Pascual-Leone - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):843-844.
Indeterminate Phrase Quantification in Japanese.Junko Shimoyama - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (2):139-173.
Five Tests for What Makes a Life Worth Living.Aaron Smuts - 2013 - Journal of Value Inquiry 47 (4):1-21.
Trust, relevance, and arguments.Fabio Paglieri & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):216-236.
Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task.Vittorio Girotto, Markus Kemmelmeier, Dan Sperber & Jean-Baptiste van der Henst - 2001 - Cognition 81 (2):B69-B76.
A value-based argument model of convention degradation.Paul E. Dunne - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (1):153-188.
Attributed Favourable Relevance and Argument Evaluation.Derek Allen - 1996 - Informal Logic 18 (2).
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Reasoning About Relations.Geoffrey P. Goodwin & Philip Johnson-Laird - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (2):468-493.
Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part I” Relevance effects in reasoning.Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (2):229-245.
Symposium on “Cognition and Rationality: Part I” Relevance effects in reasoning.Jean-Baptiste Henst - 2006 - Mind and Society 5 (2):229-245.
The “vanishing” of the disjunction effect by sensible procrastination.Maria Bagassi & Laura Macchi - 2007 - Mind and Society 6 (1):41-52.
References found in this work
Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature.Ira A. Noveck - 2001 - Cognition 78 (2):165-188.
Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Janellen Huttenlocher - 1968 - Psychological Review 75 (6):550-560.