Regulating Privacy and Biobanks in the Netherlands

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):68-84 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Netherlands does not have any specific legislation pertaining to human biological materials and data collection by biobanks. Instead, these issues are governed by a patchwork of laws, codes of practices, and other ethical instruments, where special emphasis is given to the right to privacy and self-determination. While draft legislation for biobanking was scheduled to enter into force in 2007, as of mid-2015 such legislation was still under consideration, with the intent that it would focus particularly on individual self-determination, the interests of research, the use of bodily materials collected by biobanks for criminal law purposes, and dilemmas around results that are clinically relevant for biobank participants. Under the current framework, the amount of privacy protection afforded to data is linked to its level of identifiability. International sharing of personal data to non-EU/European Economic Area countries is allowed if these countries provide adequate protection.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Taiwan Regulation of Biobanks.Chien-Te Fan, Tzu-Hsun Hung & Chan-Kun Yeh - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):816-826.
Biobanking and Privacy Laws in Australia.Don Chalmers - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):703-713.
Privacy and Biobanking in China: A Case of Policy in Transition.Haidan Chen, Benny Chan & Yann Joly - 2015 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (4):726-742.
Locating Biobanks in the Canadian Privacy Maze.Katie M. Saulnier & Yann Joly - 2016 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (1):7-19.
New Ways of Thinking about Privacy.B. Roessler - 2006 - In Anne Philips Bonnie Honig & John Dryzek (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford University Press. pp. 694-713.
Regulating brain imaging : questions of privacy, informed consent, and human dignity.Roger Brownsword - 2012 - In Sarah Richmond, Geraint Rees & Sarah J. L. Edwards (eds.), I know what you're thinking: brain imaging and mental privacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 223.
Biobanks and feedback.Kadri Simm - 2014 - In Ruth Chadwick, Mairi Levitt & Darren Shickle (eds.), The Right to Know and the Right not to Know. Cambridge University Press. pp. 55-70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
10 (#255,509)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Scientific research is a moral duty.J. Harris - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):242-248.
Introduction.Mark A. Rothstein & Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):6-6.
Introduction.Mark A. Rothstein & Bartha Maria Knoppers - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (1):6-6.

Add more references