Realism and Progress: Why Scientists should be Realists

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 38:53-72 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

For as long as realists and instrumentalists have disagreed, partisans of both sides have pointed in argument to the actions and sayings of scientists. Realists in particular have often drawn comfort from theliteralunderstanding given even to very theoretical propositions by many of those who are paid to deploy them. The scientists' realism, according to the realist, is not an idle commitment: a literal understanding of past and present theories and concepts underwrites their employment in the construction ofnewtheories. The theme of this book is philosophy and technology, and here's the connection:newtheories point out—and explain—newphenomena. So realism, claim the realists, is at the heart of science's achievement of what Bacon, that early philosopher of technology, identified as science's aim:newknowledge offeringnewpowers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-06

Downloads
38 (#410,745)

6 months
3 (#1,002,413)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robin Hendry
Durham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations