Comparative Philosophy 3 (1):58-73 (2013)
AbstractThis essay examines the strategies that Berkeley and Dharmakīrti utilize to deny that idealism entails solipsism. Beginning from similar arguments for the non-existence of matter, the two philosophers employ markedly different strategies for establishing the existence of other minds. This difference stems from their responses to the problem of intersubjective agreement. While Berkeley’s reliance on his Cartesian inheritance does allow him to account for intersubjective agreement without descending into solipsism, it nevertheless prevents him from establishing the existence of other finite minds. I argue that Dharmakīrti, in accounting for intersubjective agreement causally, is able to avoid Berkeley’s shortcoming. I conclude by considering a challenge to Dharmakīrti’s use of inference that Ratnakīrti, a Buddhist successor of Dharmakīrti, advances in his “Disproof of the Existence of Other Minds” and briefly exploring a possible response that someone who wants to advocate an idealist position could give
Similar books and articles
Dharmakīrti's dualism: Critical reflections on a buddhist proof of rebirth.Dan Arnold - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1079-1096.
Buddhist idealism, epistemic and otherwise: Thoughts on the alternating perspectives of dharmakīrti.Dan Arnold - 2008 - Sophia 47 (1):3-28.
Otherness in the pratyabhijñā philosophy.Isabelle Ratié - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (4):313-370.
Berkeley, the Author of Nature, and the Judeo-Christian God.Ekaterina Y. Ksenjek & Daniel E. Flage - 2012 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 29 (3):281-300.
A "Restricted" Interpretation of Dharmakīrti's Philosophy. [REVIEW]Christian Coseru - 2006 - H-Net Reviews in the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Dharmakīrti's Pramāṇavārttika: An Annotated Translation of the Fourth Chapter (Parārthānumāna). Dharmakīrti - 2000 - Österreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften.
Determining which jaina philosopher was the object of dharmakīrti's criticisms.Fujinaga Sin - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (3):378-384.
Śālikanātha’s Criticism of Dharmakīrti’s svasaṃvedana Theory.Taiken Kyuma - 2010 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 38 (3):247-259.
Realizing the unreal: Dharmakīrti’s theory of yogic perception. [REVIEW]John D. Dunne - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (6):497-519.
Berkeley's Meta-Ontology: Bodies, Forces, and the Semantics of 'Exists'.Kenneth L. Pearce - manuscript
Berkeley, God, and Explanation.Douglas M. Jesseph - 2005 - In Christia Mercer (ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Panpsychism and the First-Person Perspective: The Case for Panpsychist Idealism.Brentyn Ramm - 2021 - Mind and Matter 19 (1):75-106.
Ratnakīrti and the Extent of Inner Space: an Essay on Yogācāra and the Threat of Genuine Solipsism.Sonam Kachru - 2019 - Sophia 58 (1):61-83.
References found in this work
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1.René Descartes - 1984 - Cambridge University Press.
Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting.Hanne De Jaegher - 2009 - Consciousness and Cognition 18 (2):535-542.
Making sense of sense-making: Reflections on enactive and extended mind theories.Evan Thompson & Mog Stapleton - 2009 - Topoi 28 (1):23-30.
The Philosophical Writings of Descartes: Volume 1.John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff & Dugald Murdoch (eds.) - 1629 - Cambridge University Press.