Correction to: Methods of data collection in psychopathology: the role of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews

Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21 (1):31-32 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Research in psychopathology is booming in an unprecedented way, at least, in terms of increasing number of publications. Yet, a few questions arise: Does quantity also give us quality? Are the collected data generally of sound quality? How are data typically collected in psychopathology? Are the applied methods of data collection appropriate for this particular field of study? This article explores three different methods of data collection in psychopathology, namely self-rating scales, structured interviews, and semi-structured, phenomenological interviews. To identify the most adequate methodological approach, we first establish the nature of the object of psychopathology and then we critically assess each method’s appropriateness to this field of study. We emphasize fundamental issues that make self-rating scales and structured interviews unfit for the task of adequately examining psychopathology. By contrast, we propose that a semi-structured, phenomenological interview presents a more appropriate method. Finally, we describe two types of semi-structured, phenomenological interviews that can be applied to assess and explore psychopathology, respectively.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talks With Father William: Senile or Sensible?Elizabeth W. Markson & Maryvonne Gognalons-Caillard - 1971 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 1 (2):193-208.


Added to PP

31 (#518,746)

6 months
14 (#184,493)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mads G. Henriksen
University of Copenhagen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations