Authors
Tempest Henning
Vanderbilt University
Abstract
This paper critically examines non-adversarial feminist argumentation model specifically within the scope of politeness norms and cultural communicative practices. Asserting women typically have a particular mode of arguing which is often seen as ‘weak’ or docile within male dominated fields, the model argues that the feminine mode of arguing is actually more affiliative and community orientated, which should become the standard within argumentation as opposed to the Adversary Method. I argue that the nonadversarial feminist argumentation model primarily focuses on one demographic of women’s communicative styles – white women. Taking an intersectional approach, I examine practices within African American women’s speech communities to illustrate the ways in which the virtues and vices purported by the NAFAM fails to capture other ways of productive argumentation.
Keywords feminist argumentation theory  intersectionality  African American Vernacular English
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1584-174X
DOI 10.5840/symposion20185216
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Feminist Perspectives on Argumentation.Catherine E. Hundleby - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytic Feminism.Ann Garry - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bringing Wreck.Tempest Henning - forthcoming - Symposion. Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences.
Are Women Beach Volleyballers ‘Too Sexy for Their Shorts?’.J. Angelo Corlett - 2017 - Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 4 (1):7-15.
Using Rights to Counter “Gender-Specific” Wrongs.Theresa Tobin - 2008 - Human Rights Review 10 (4):521-530.
Persuasive Argumentation as a Cultural Practice.Paweł GAŁKOWSKI - 2014 - Argument: Biannual Philosophical Journal 4 (1):123-134.
Emergent Vs. Dogmatic Arguing.Marco Rühl - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (2):151-171.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-28

Total views
157 ( #75,823 of 2,520,772 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
19 ( #44,506 of 2,520,772 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes