Managers' personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility

Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):33-44 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this theoretical paper, motives for CSR are considered. An underlying assumption is that the commercial imperative is not the sole driver of CSR decision-making in private sector companies, but that the formal adoption and implementation of CSR by corporations could be associated with the changing personal values of individual managers. These values may find expression through the opportunity to exercise discretion, which may arise in various ways. It is suggested that in so far as CSR initiatives represent individuals' values, so the responsibility in evidence is less obviously corporate. Our emphasis on personal initiative is intended to counter a tendency to view the corporation as the agent, and may serve to remind us that individuals can, indeed, make a difference.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
292 (#71,993)

6 months
28 (#111,911)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christine Hemingway
Goldsmiths College, University of London

References found in this work

Business & society: ethics and stakeholder management.Archie B. Carroll - 2002 - Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western College Pub./Thomson Learning. Edited by Ann K. Buchholtz.
Management and morality: a developmental perspective.Patrick Maclagan - 1998 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Corporate social responsibility as a participative process.Patrick Maclagan - 1999 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 8 (1):43–49.
Egoism.Kurt Baier - 1991 - In Peter Singer (ed.), A Companion to Ethics. Cambridge, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Moral agency as victim of the vulnerability of autonomy.Alan Lovell - 2002 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 11 (1):62–76.

View all 9 references / Add more references