A physicalist account of multiple realizability in the special sciences

Abstract

Multiple realizability seems to be empirically justified and provides the conceptual basis for the autonomy of the special sciences. But it is mysterious. In this talk I propose a new reductionist approach to the special sciences that removes the mystery: I explain why the special sciences kinds appear to be multiply realized although they are identical with physical kinds and in what sense the special sciences kinds and laws are autonomous although they are physical laws. This approach is based on the approach by Hemmo & Shenker to the reduction of thermodynamics to statistical mechanics.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The emergence of macroscopic regularity.Meir Hemmo & Orly Shenker - 2015 - Mind and Society 14 (2):221-244.
Multiple realizability and universality.Robert W. Batterman - 2000 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (1):115-145.
Historical kinds and the "special sciences".Ruth Garrett Millikan - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (1-2):45-65.
What multiple realizability does not show.Robert Francescotti - 1997 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 18 (1):13-28.
The Special Science Dilemma and How Culture Solves It.Marion Godman - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):1-18.
Multiple realizability.Eric Funkhouser - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 2 (2):303–315.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-14

Downloads
51 (#305,341)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Orly Shenker
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references