What German experts expect from individualized medicine: problems of uncertainty and future complication in physician–patient interaction

Clinical Ethics 7 (2):86-93 (2012)

Abstract

‘Individualized medicine’ is an emerging paradigm in clinical life science research. We conducted a socio-empirical interview study in a leading German clinical research group, aiming at implementing ‘individualized medicine’ of colorectal cancer. The goal was to investigate moral and social issues related to physician–patient interaction and clinical care, and to identify the points raised, supported and rejected by the physicians and researchers. Up to now there has been only limited insight into how experts dedicated to individualized medicine view its problems. Interviews with researchers and clinicians (n= 19) were based on a prestructured questionnaire. The content analysis revealed a broad spectrum of opinions. Major findings were (a) disappointments with the limits of the current therapy regimen and clinical practice; (b) problematic impacts on physician–patient relationship; and (c) an informed consent procedure which is mainly based on paternalistic assumptions. According to our analysis, major problems will be uncertainties related to the biomarker's sensitivity and specificity, and the identification of ‘non-responders’. However, the findings also indicate that experts expect evidence-based medicine to replace decisions based on gut feeling or hierarchical structures

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,743

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
68 (#172,372)

6 months
1 (#387,390)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Context, Ethics and Pharmacogenetics.Adam M. Hedgecoe - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):566-582.
Context, Ethics and Pharmacogenetics.Adam M. Hedgecoe - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (3):566-582.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Similar books and articles

Reflections on a Medical Ethics for the Future.Andre Vries - 1982 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3 (1):115-120.
Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty?Richard T. Hull - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Does Physician Assisted Suicide Violate the Integrity of Medicine?Richard Momeyer - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (1):13-24.
Viktor Emil Von Gebsattel on the Doctor-Patient Relationship.Jos V. M. Welie - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).
Patients and Profits.Mark Yarborough - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response.P. Burcher - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Physician and Patient: Respect for Mutuality.David Gary Smith & Lisa H. Newton - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (1).
What Does a `Right' to Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) Legally Entail?M. T. Harvey - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):271-286.
Ethical Issues in Family Medicine.Ronald J. Christie - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Competition and the Patient-Centered Ethic.George W. Rainbolt - 1987 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.