Morality, care, and international law

Ethics and Global Politics 4 (3):173-194 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whether we should respect international law is in dispute. In the United States, international law is dismissed by the left as merely promoting the interests of powerful states. It is attacked by the right as irrelevant and an interference with the interests and mission of the United States. And it follows from the arguments of many liberals that in the absence of world government the world is in a Hobbesian state of nature and international law inapplicable. This article reviews the thinking of Kant, Locke, and Rawls, among others and shows how arguments against respect for international law can be answered. It questions arguments based on the analogy between states and individuals, and between international law as it has developed and law based on an ideal social contract between individuals. It then turns to the ethics of care, a recent addition to moral theory, and examines its major characteristics and recommendations. It considers how the ethics of care would view international law and the guidance this moral approach could provide for international relations. The article shows how the ethics of care is compatible with various current trends, and how thinking about globalization and greater international interdependence would benefit from greater attention to it. The article argues that the ethics of care would clearly support respect for international law as it has developed, but that it would even more strongly support addressing current problems in ways that would, in the longer term, make appeals to law and its enforcements ever less necessary. Keywords: international law; the ethics of care; moral theory; political theory; social contract; states; groups; Hobbes; Kant; Locke (Published: 16 September 2011) Citation: Ethics & Global Politics, Vol. 4 , No. 3, 2011, pp. 173-194. DOI: 10.3402/egp.v4i3.8405

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law and Morality.Leon Petraå¼Ycki - 1955 - Translation Publishers.
The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oup Usa. Edited by David Copp.
The ethics of care: personal, political, and global.Virginia Held - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
About morality and the nature of law.Joseph Raz - 2003 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (1):1-15.
The limits of international law.Jack L. Goldsmith - 2005 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Eric A. Posner.
Law and morality.John Gardner - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.
The morality of war and the law of war.Jeff McMahan - 2008 - In David Rodin & Henry Shue (eds.), Just and Unjust Warriors: The Moral and Legal Status of Soldiers. Oxford University Press. pp. 19--43.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-09-20

Downloads
83 (#185,497)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Virginia Held
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

The Ethics of Care as Normative Guidance: Comment on Gilligan.Virginia Held - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (1):107-115.
Caring Actions.Steven Steyl - 2020 - Hypatia 35 (2):279-297.
Taking Responsibility for Global Poverty.Virginia Held - 2018 - Journal of Social Philosophy 49 (3):393-414.
Care Ethics and the Future of Work: a Different Voice.Madelaine Ley - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (1):1-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references