How dare you think divergently!

Approaching Religion 12 (1):36-54 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Freethinking seems to be desirable because the human being is seen as an independently thinking being. However, as is well known, freethinking should not be taken for granted: ideological indoctrination, manipulation and propaganda, inter alia, are versatile tools for rulers and, in consequence, regularly repeated phenomena. One of the most drastic intellectual turning points in history occurred in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, when the incontestable religious world view of European civilization changed along with early modern science and the Age of Enlightenment. Although freethinking and religion do not have to be thought of as opposed, the period in question includes instances of complex and delicate phenomena, which in this article are termed intellectual purism and socio-intellectual control. The discussion includes how five thinkers operated in a restrictive politico-religio-theological framework and how they manifest religious deviance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

From ‘Dare to Think!’ to ‘How Dare You!’ and back again.Daniel Ross - 2020 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 52 (4):466-474.
Dare We Develop a Human Science?George S. Howard - 1986 - Academic Publications.
Dare We Develop a Human Science? [REVIEW]Mufid J. Hannush - 1989 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 20 (1):91-94.
Dare to know, dare to tell, dare to play.Helga Nowotny - 2011 - Approaching Religion 1 (2):49-53.
Resistance! Do Teachers Dare to Strike and Insist Upon Collective Bargaining in this Neoliberal Age?Pamela K. Smith - 2012 - Educational Studies: A Jrnl of the American Educ. Studies Assoc 48 (6):499-500.
Book reviews. [REVIEW]Tim Dare - 1995 - Mind 104 (415):654-658.
"religious Activities" In Shanxi And Heilongjiang.[author unknown] - 1996 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 28 (1):28-33.
Sources of information in human action.Jeff Loucks & Dare Baldwin - 2008 - In B. C. Love, K. McRae & V. M. Sloutsky (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society. pp. 121--126.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
9 (#1,154,504)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Early German Philosophy: Kant and His Predecessors.Lewis White Beck - 1969 - Cambridge, Mass.,: St. Augustine's Press.
Immanuel Kant.Michael Rohlf - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Christian Wolff.Matt Hettche & Corey W. Dyck - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Spinoza.Stuart Hampshire - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):77-78.

View all 15 references / Add more references