In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 211- (1982)
AbstractIn recent years the doctrine that God exists in a timeless eternity has achieved something of the status of philosophical heterodoxy, if not of downright heresy. The arguments against the idea of God's timeless eternity come from two sources. The first of these is Professor Kneale's paper ‘Time and Eternity in Theology’ in which, alluding to the famous definition of eternity by Boethius as ‘the complete possession of eternal life at once’ Professor Kneale confesses ‘I can attach no meaning to the word “life” unless I am allowed to suppose that what has life acts… life must at least involve some incidents in time and if, like Boethius, we suppose the life in question to be intelligent, then it must involve also awareness of the passage of time’
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Omnipresence and the Location of the Immaterial.Ross Inman - 2017 - In Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, Volume 7. Oxford University Press.
Similar books and articles
God the What?: What Our Metaphors for God Reveal About Our Beliefs in God.Carolyn Stahl Bohler - 2008 - Skylight Paths.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Elmer L. Towns - 2009 - Regal Books.
Referring to God: Jewish and Christian Philosophical and Theological Perspectives.Paul Helm (ed.) - 1999 - Curzon Press.
The Fidelity of Betrayal: Towards a Church Beyond Belief.Peter Rollins - 2008 - Paraclete Press.
God Laughs: And Other Surprising Things You Never Knew About Him.Charles Billingsley - 2009 - Regal Books.