Anti-Essentialism and Counterpart Theory

The Monist 88 (4):600-618 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Anti-essentialism holds that no thing has any modal properties except relative to a conceptualization—for instance, relative to a description. One and the same thing might be essentially rational relative to the description “mathematician” but only accidentally rational relative to the description “bicyclist.” Anti-essentialism was dominant in pre-Kripkean days. The old description theory of names made room for anti-essentialism by reducing apparently true de re modal attributions to de dicto ones by way of the hidden description. We can follow Kripke in giving up the description theory without thereby giving up anti-essentialism. Counterpart theory makes room for anti-essentialism by interpreting de re modal attributions by way of counterparts and allowing that different other-worldly objects count as a thing’s counterparts relative to different ways of thinking of the thing. One thing is essentially physical when thought of as a body but only accidentally physical when thought of as a person. One thing has its shape essentially when thought of as a statue but only accidentally when thought of as a lump of clay. The metaphysical meat of counterpart theory is that it allows for anti-essentialism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Counterpart Theory, Natural Properties, and Essentialism.Todd Buras - 2006 - Journal of Philosophy 103 (1):27-42.
Review: Ways an Actualist Might Be. [REVIEW]Michael Nelson - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (3):455-471.
Overall similarity, natural properties, and paraphrases.Ghislain Guigon - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):387-399.
Evolutionary essentialism.Denis Walsh - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):425-448.
Composition as identity, mereological essentialism, and counterpart theory.Trenton Merricks - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):192 – 195.
Essence and anti-essentialism about art.Lauren Tillinghast - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):167-183.
Kripkean Counterpart Theory.Murali Ramachandran - 2008 - Polish Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):89-106.
Normativizing hybridity/ neutralizing culture.Nikolas Kompridis - 2005 - Political Theory 33 (3):318 - 343.
Dupre's anti-essentialist objection to reductionism.D. Gene Witmer - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):181-200.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
173 (#106,647)

6 months
12 (#145,875)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Heller
Syracuse University

Citations of this work

Counterfactual Similarity, Nomic Indiscernibility, and the Paradox of Quidditism.Andrew D. Bassford & C. Daniel Dolson - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (1):230-261.
Haecceitism.Sam Cowling - 2015 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A Response to Chisholm’s Paradox.Andrew Dennis Bassford - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (4):1137-1155.
Is L.A. Paul’s Essentialism Really Deeper than Lewis’s?Cristina Nencha - 2024 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 20 (1):31-54.
Applications and Extensions of Counterpart Theory.Peterson Bridgette - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references